This Article focuses on the significant decisions that have emanated from Australian courts over the past year. It aims to provide readers with an insight into Australian maritime law and its development over this period.
While a cruise vacation may very well be the best travel value available, consumers should be aware that a cruise line’s duties and liabilities are governed not by modern, consumer-oriented common and statutory law, but by nineteenth-century legal principles, the purpose being to insulate these companies from legitimate passenger claims. … For example, if CLIA […]
This is the thirteenth Article in a series of annual reports on U.S. admiralty and maritime law and practice. In these articles, we try to call attention to the principal national-level developments that bear on the work of admiralty judges, lawyers, and scholars, and we look more closely at the relevant work of the United […]
This Essay will focus on (1) changes to the statutes governing removal of lawsuits by the “Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011” (Clarification Act)and (2) how those changes have been interpreted by courts within the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s jurisdiction. The Clarification Act makes removal of maritime […]
Twenty-six cruise lines headquartered in North America, which form the Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA), presently sail 225 ships throughout the world. In addition, numerous cargo ships, tankers, and other vessels are operated by companies maintaining their bases of operations in the United States. As a result, it is not uncommon for these vessels periodically to […]
Traditionally, there have been two sources of maritime law: national maritime law and international maritime law. Today, however, there is a third source, namely, European Union (EU) maritime law. EU maritime law is not national maritime law because the EU is not a nation. Nor is it international law because the EU is not simply a network […]
The second issue of Volume 38 of the Tulane Maritime Law Journal is now available in both print and digital format. Purchase yours today!
The Tulane Maritime Law Journal is proud to present the second installment in a series of forthcoming posts concerning recent developments in admiralty and maritime law written by members of the Tulane Maritime Law Journal. *This post has not undergone our full editorial process. By: Brooke Bacuetes PROMOTING JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY: THE SECOND CIRCUIT’S EXPANSION OF […]
Congratulations to both of the Journal’s Judge John R. Brown Admiralty Appellate Moot Court Teams! Both Teams performed admirably at the 21st Annual Competition, which was sponsored by the University of Texas School of Law and Tulane University Law School and was held in New Orleans, Louisiana, on April 3-5, 2014. Both Teams were composed […]
Presented by the ABA TIPS Admiralty & Maritime Law Committee. Graciously hosted by Liskow & Lewis. Featuring: Yaakov Adler — Introductory remarks Laura R. Beck — Punitive Damages Stowaway in the Fifth Circuit: McBride v. Estis Well Service, L.L.C. James K. Dumont — Pleading Insanity in Piercing the Corporate Veil: Supplemental Rule E’s Heightened Pleading Standard […]